In Re : DMR June 15 2015 to US Department of Education, NY HESC, US SSA, and filed to American Express v DMR in NY State Supreme Court Suffolk County Index # 061458/2013 via Efile and thereby associated with NY State Supreme Manhattan Index # 100156/2011 {Reference this Document "DMRJune152015toDOENYHESCSSAFederalStateFinancial" to
http://www.twentyfirstcenturydigital.com/DOEJune102015DMRosenblumAffirmationMay242015.php &
http://www.twentyfirstcenturydigital.com/DMRJune152015toDOENYHESCSSAFederalStateFinancial.php }:
REGARDING FEDERAL AND STATE FINANCES, LIABILITIES, OBLIGATIONS, AND RELATED JURISPRUDENCE ASSOCIATED WITH MY PERSON, "DMR" {DANIEL M ROSENBLUM, THE UNDERSIGNED, BIRTH DATE MARCH 23 1969} //DMR June 10 2015/
Public Notice Published July 15 2015
http://www.twentyfirstcenturydigital.com/DOEJune102015DMRosenblumAffirmationMay242015.php
and I have today June 15 2015 filed a PDF of the content of such June 15 2015 "DMRJune152015toDOENYHESCSSAFederalStateFinancial" Public Notice URLs on the World Wide Web above and below listed in New York State Supreme Court via EFile in the related legal matter, American Express v. Daniel M Rosenblum.
In addition, I DMR have electronically served the same above and below URLs to US Department of Education, and NYS Higher Education Services Corporation electronically by emailing PDFs of the same to :
'arne.duncan@ed.gov'; 'Phil.Rosenfelt@ed.gov'; 'elizabeth.mcfadden@ed.gov'; 'Greer.armandroff@ed.gov'; Dwight.vigna@ed.gov; Cynthia.battle@ed.gov; Gary.hopkins@ed.gov; 'Elsa.Magee@hesc.ny.gov'; 'John.Austin@hesc.ny.gov'; 'Kathy.Crowder@hesc.ny.gov'; 'Thomas.Brennan@hesc.ny.gov'; 'Matt.Downey@hesc.ny.gov'; 'Richard.Valenti@its.ny.gov'; 'Warren.Wallin@hesc.ny.gov'; 'Joe.Bradley@hesc.ny.gov'; 'Piper.Lutbak@hesc.ny.gov'; dept736@HESC.ny.gov; phenry@stern.nyu.edu; peter.henry@stern.nyu.edu; 'dmr@21centdig.com'; 'dan@21centdig.com'; 'dmr417@stern.nyu.edu'; steven.key@occ.treas.gov; gary.jeffers@occ.treas.gov; rstorch@fdic.gov; mflanigan@fdic.gov; jschmitt@fdic.gov; regs.comments@occ.treas; regs.comments@federalreserve.gov; comments@FDIC.gov
cc:
'aklinger@strook.com'; 'john.carter.armstrong@citi.com'; 'customerresolution@navient-mail.com'; 'customerresolution@navient.com'; 'christi.hewes@navient.com'; 'christi.hewes@navient-mail.com'; 'lynsie.sutton@navient.com'; 'Deanna.bremer@navient.com'; 'customerresolution@navient.com'; 'matthew.sheldon@navient.com'; 'chairmansoffice@aexp.com'; 'mike.o’neill@aexp.com'; 'judy.g.tenzer@aexp.com'; 'kenneth.i.chenault@aexp.com'; 'edward.p.gilligan@aexp.com'; 'alfred.f.kelly@aexp.com'; 'l.kevin.cox@aexp.com'; 'john.d.hayes@aexp.com'; 'douglas.e.buckminster@aexp.com'; 'william.h.glenn@aexp.com'; 'kenneth.chenault@aexp.com'; 'edward.gilligan@aexp.com'; 'alfred.kelly@aexp.com'; 'john.hayes@aexp.com'; 'douglas.buckminster@aexp.com'; 'william.glenn@aexp.com'; 'carol.schwartz@aexp.com'; 'troy.anderson@xerox.com'; 'jennifer.horsley@xerox.com'; 'corporatesecretary@salliemae.com'; 'areese@adoptionpolicy.org'; 'ideas@cueball.com'; 'ping@cueball.com'; 'stockholders@navient.com'; 'Mark.Heleen@Navient.com'; 'Domain.registrar@xerox.com'; 'domtechadmin@navient.com'; 'Jerry.Maher@Navient.com'; 'Sheila.Ryan-Macie@navient.com'; 'Pat.Lawicki@Navient.com'; 'Steve.Hauber@Navient.com'; 'Andy.Beamon@Navient.com'; 'Timothy.Hynes@navient.com'; 'Somsak.Chivavibul@Navient.com'; 'John.Kane@Navient.com'; 'Jack.Remondi@Navient.com'; 'fixedincomeir@citi.com'; 'investorrelations@citi.com'; 'shareholderrelations@citi.com'; 'docserve@citi.com'; 'speakers@citi.com'; 'ernesto.zedillo@yale.edu'; 'jes138@columbia.edu'; 'Classact@gilardi.com'; 'peter.crudo@gilardi.com'; 'lara.mcdermott@gilardi.com'; 'daniel.burke@gilardi.com'; 'kurt.slawson@navient.com'; 'Options@ecmc.org'; 'mmkeler@gmail.com'; 'corporatesecretary@salliemae.com'; 'hnewman@pinebrookpartners.com'; 'CONTACT@FFLPARTNERS.COM'; 'areese@adoptionpolicy.org'; 'ping@cueball.com'; 'emailsupport@acs-inc.com'; 'Sharon_Forbes@hesc.ny.gov'; 'Donna_Fesel@hesc.ny.gov'; 'Escalated_Inquiries@salliemae.com'; 'chairmansoffice@aexp.com'; 'jyulee@zwickerpc.com'; 'gmsamples@zwickerpc.com'; 'ggalterio@jaffeandasher.com'; 'iglauber@jaffeandasher.com'; 'rluisi@jaffeandasher.com'; 'dluke@jaffeandasher.com'; 'Lnessenson@jaffeandasher.com'; 'mPotashner@jaffeandasher.com'; 'sasher@jaffeandasher.com'; 'Kevin.T.Udy@aexp.com'; 'defaultprevention@hesc.ny.gov'; 'Liza.Rogers@xerox.com'; 'emailsupport@acs-inc.com'; 'dmr417@stern.nyu.edu'; 'pjaffe2624@aol.com'; 'gshore@zwickerpc.com'; 'gary@zwickerpc.com'; 'rthuotte@zwickerpc.com'; 'rlee@zwickerpc.com'; 'andrewdick@zwickerpc.com'; 'alerner@zwickerpc.com'; 'cferguson@zwickerpc.com'; 'Ceo@zwickerpc.com'; 'cfreitas@zwickerpc.com'; 'frankelrudd@aol.com'; jjm19@cornell.edu; kdn1@cornell.edu; pam4@cornell.edu; ske1@cornell.edu; ner3@cornell.edu; counsel-web@cornell.edu; secretary@med.cornell.edu; dean@med.cornell.edu; 'smcantor@hotmail.com'; 'sbann@zwickerpc.com'
AND
Notice intended for, amongst others, :
Scott G. Alvarez, General Counsel Legal Division Lauri Schaffer, Associate General Counsel Legal Division Mark E. Van Der Weide, Senior Associate Director Division of Banking Supervision and Regulation
Robert deV. Frierson Secretary Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System 20th Street and Constitution Avenue NW Washington, DC 20551 Reqs.comments@federalreserve.gov
This email follows a transmission to the same parties and intended parties to actions in two jurisdictions, Manhattan County and Suffolk County, both actions with title American Express v Daniel M Rosenblum, to whom I Daniel M Rosenblum emailed legal papers last on Presidents Day 2015 2/2015. The Suffolk action was commenced by Amex 2013, and is an Efile case in NY State Supreme Court with Index # . The Manhattan action was commenced by Amex in 2011, and is a hard copy case. The subject matter in both cases is identical. My answer to the subject matter was filed in hard copy in 2011 in Manhattan, which answer is therefore answer to the Suffolk matter as per the CPLR.
The CPLR requires Judicial discontinuance by order upon motion, or judicial decision, or stipulation amongst the parties for any just resolution to any litigation commenced in NY State Supreme Court. Subject matters related to controversy at bar in litigation in subject to Joinder under the CPLR. Here, all parties and intending joinder parties are given notice to subject matter here contained. Intended Joinder parties, as described variously throughout my filings in Manhattan and Suffolk, include but are not limited to the firms Jaffe and Asher, Zwicker PC, NYHESC, US Department of Education, Navient, Sallie Mae, Citigroup, et. al. .
Regarding Citigroup, it has been my preference over years to serve papers giving notice of an unresolved dispute to Board Members and Senior Corporate Officers electronically. However, it is difficult to obtain email addresses for appropriate electronic service of notice.
Therefore, presently, in addition to the Citigroup attorneys and staff to whom my Notice is directed regarding Joinder Issues to American Express v Daniel M Rosenblum, henceforth I have added the electronic address of Citigroup’s soon to be newest Board Member, Peter Blair Henry, for the purpose of giving continued Notice to Citigroup.
Citigroup announced on February 17th 2015 that Dean Blair was elected as a new independent director with his service to commence July 1, 2015. While Mr. Blair’s tenure has not yet begun at the time of transmission of today’s Notice, I have added Dean Blair presently to facilitate Notice to Citigroup both presently by way of J C Armstrong et al, and, by continuing way of the Citigroup Board July 2015 and thereafter.
Mr. Blair is Dean of NYU Stern School of Business, from where I graduated with an EMBA with the A11 cohort during June of 2011. NYU Stern School of Business (and NY Law School) received funds administered and/or serviced by US Dept. of Education, NYHESC, Sallie Mae, Navient, and/or ACS Xerox___.
Presently in 2015, 15% of my weekly wages of $ 15.50 per hour for driving a truck to deliver shower door glass are garnished by NYHESC as the only source of payment towards over $ 750,000.00 accumulated debt which financed my Juris Doctorate and Masters of Business Administration. I have not yet taken any Bar exam in any State. My primary purpose in adding Dean Peter Henry Blair is to give Notice of the alleged unresolved controversy(ies) with Citigroup which subject matter(s), inter alia, I allege should be joined to the subject matter at Bar in Amex v Dan.
On April 15, 2015 I did file; PDF and URL, therefore two copies of each.
AND
http://www.twentyfirstcenturydigital.com/DOEJune102015DMRosenblumAffirmationIMAGES.php
and
http://www.twentyfirstcenturydigital.com/MayJunePOBox3377NoticesfromDEONYHESCSSA.php
In addition the URLs and subject matter are provided to via email to Officers and Counsel and Directors at the Agencies, and similarly insofar as the intended joinder parties including corporate and partnerships to whom Notice and Process is served as listed above and in the NYSCEF EFile.
JUNE 15 2015 Eleven URLs Roman Numerals I-XI
"DMRJune152015toDOENYHESCSSAFederalStateFinancial":
http://www.twentyfirstcenturydigital.com/AffidavitofServicePresidentsDay2015.php
http://twentyfirstcenturydigital.com/December032014SeriesI.php
http://www.twentyfirstcenturydigital.com/December032014SeriesA.php
http://www.twentyfirstcenturydigital.com/December032014SeriesR.php
http://www.twentyfirstcenturydigital.com/December032014SeriesC.php
http://www.twentyfirstcenturydigital.com/December032014SeriesD.php
http://www.twentyfirstcenturydigital.com/December032014SeriesE.php
http://www.twentyfirstcenturydigital.com/December032014SeriesF.php
http://twentyfirstcenturydigital.com/Amex09152013DocList.php
Images of the full case as viewed on the NYSCEF system as of November 2014 can be viewed on this web page, which has live links to NYSCEF for most filed items:
The full case can be viewed on the NYSCEF LIVE SYSTEM BY LOGGING IN AT : https://iapps.courts.state.ny.us/nyscef/Login
AND
The instant Notice, titled "June 15 2015 Notice to DOE, NYHESC and SSA by DMR " [carrying the above list of URLs as indicated emailed to each listed Officer at DOE {"@ed.gov" } and HESC etc, ] ONLY is mailed in hardcopy to DOE, NYHESC, and SSA, each of which seem to avoid, by deliberate operational policy, receipt of Process and Notice via electronic means.
Please note that images of directions from DOE NYHESC and SSA to these physical addresses only for response to 60 Day Notice can be viewed at :
http://www.twentyfirstcenturydigital.com/DOEJune102015DMRosenblumAffirmationIMAGES.php
http://www.twentyfirstcenturydigital.com/MayJunePOBox3377NoticesfromDEONYHESCSSA.php
DOE is of knowledge and or should be of knowledge , is aware, and or should be aware that DMR has of record denied default status of contract.
DOE is of knowledge and or should be of knowledge , is aware, and or should be aware that DMR has of record denied default status of contract.
DMR states that it is ludicrous that it is not of record at DOE and HESC that DMR is of opinion and belief that a judicial determination of the funds in question would be found in favor of DMR were there jurisprudence applied to the allegation of default, and by way of which DMR has previously requested Review which has not taken place to date.
The mere fact that it is not of record as part and parcel of the DOE 4/16/2015 Notice of Default that DMR is of the same opinion of this full filing is proof, the mere fact that it is not of record is proof of DMRs argument that DOE HESC and their full portfolio is not subject to Jurisprudence in keeping with Federal or State Due Process as it pertains to the allegation of default. The DOE / NYHESC operational system in house, and, as it pertains to contracted tasks, and, the operational systems of contracted task providers for servicing of the full loan portfolio in question for adjudications/ determination s of allegations of breach of contract through default fails in rising to acceptable level of due process
NYHESC, Navient, Sallie Mae, ACS Xerox , DOE is of knowledge and or should be of knowledge , is aware, and or should be aware that DMR has of record denied default status of contract.
It is of record that DMR states Non-default, MPN invalid, Terms invalid, Defenses in contract
Administrative adjudication improper to contract form ; Administrative adjudication inappropriate, insufficient to replace Courts of General Jurisdiction;
Loans are contracts, when a contract is breached in the USA the lender can allege breach of contract in Courts of General Jurisdiction, and, the rules of jurisprudence guide towards 'just adjudication' of the alleged breach of contract. Such jurisprudence includes the ability for a defendant to put forth defenses against breach of contract, and, to make the case that joinder subject matter is appropriate to be heard in before the Court and Judge in consideration of the allegation of default. No borrower wants to default. All borrowers want just adjudications of subject matter which might cause inability to perform on a contract. All future borrowers deserve the precedents of justice in any marketplace, especially the educational loan marketplace. No defenses on allegation of breach are heard in the educational loan marketplace, and no joinder subject matter is heard in adjudication in the educational loan marketplace.
Virtually all educational loans are being approved, with the beneficiary of funds being the educational institution, the lender has a lien on all future earnings of the borrower. A major problem is that student loans are liens, not loans. The problem is huge, and circumvents checks and balances. Allegations of Educational loan default must be heard in Courts of General Jurisdiction, subject to CPLR etc, not before DOE or HESC.
Either Congress erred or DOE is not carrying out Congressional intent, or combination of both.
DANIEL M ROSENBLUM, THE UNDERSIGNED
BIRTH DATE MARCH 23 1969
// DMR // June 15 2015//
additional images and links to information regarding the above subject matter including 21st Century Digital, and, my New York NY hard copy and Suffolk NYSCEF filings in the matter of American Express v Daniel M Rosenblum are available via Dan's website at the filing web pages:
http://www.twentyfirstcenturydigital.com/December032014SeriesI.php
http://www.twentyfirstcenturydigital.com/ThursdayDecember51996.php
http://www.twentyfirstcenturydigital.com/TTSMay1996toMay2012.php
http://www.twentyfirstcenturydigital.com/December_9_1996_Twenty_First_Century_Digital.php
http://www.twentyfirstcenturydigital.com/MondayDecember9199621stCenturyDigitalestablished.php
http://www.twentyfirstcenturydigital.com/amex.php
http://www.twentyfirstcenturydigital.com/Amex09152013DocList.php
http://www.twentyfirstcenturydigital.com/DMROriginalApril142011answer.php
http://www.twentyfirstcenturydigital.com/April51999.php
http://www.twentyfirstcenturydigital.com/Beach2000-2005.php
http://www.twentyfirstcenturydigital.com/TheLawTheBankAndTheBeach.php
http://www.twentyfirstcenturydigital.com/TTSDocket19961997.php
21st Century Digital ™ is both a common law and statutory trademark. Common law rights in the Mark inhere with the establishment of Sole Proprietorship Twenty First Century Digital by Proprietor Daniel M Rosenblum December 9th 1996 New York New York and continued use to date. Please see above and below for more information on common law trademark use and rights.
21st Century Digital® has four (4) USPTO Trademark Registrations:
USPTO ®™ Registration Number 4,007,885 Registered Aug. 9, 2011 USPTO International Class 35: Advertising and Business
USPTO ®™ Registration Number 4,051,315 Registered Nov. 8, 2011 USPTO International Class 36: Financial Services
USPTO ®™ Registration Number 4,051,315 Registered Nov. 8, 2011 USPTO International Class 38: Telecommunications
USPTO ®™ Registration Number 3,626,967 Registered May 26, 2009 USPTO International Class 42: Computer/Internet R & D
A patent application for a "21st Century Digital™ Network" was filed with the United States Patent and Trademark Office on March 26, 2008 and published on October 1, 2009 by the United States Patent and Trademark Office as Publication Number US 2009/0248536 Al; USPTO Publication US 2009/0248536 Al is five (5) pages in entirety including the drawing of the invention and can be viewed on the USPTO website Patent Application Retrieval (PAIR) system. No patent for a "21st Century Digital Network" product granted to date, nor is one pending. The status of the patent application at the United States Patent and Trademark Office is "abandoned" as of March 23rd, 2012, for applicant failure to respond to a USPTO Office Action Notice of Final Rejection September 9 2011. Applicant's most recent filing on USPTO patent application for a "21st Century Digital™ Network", USPTO Publication Number US 2009/0248536 Al, one hundred and fifty two pages regarding the 21st Century Digital Network product was filed July 2011 and is also viewable on the USPTO website Patent Application Retrieval (PAIR) system.
Public Notice June 15, 2015 21st Century Digital ®